October 26th, 2004 - 12:50 pm

» the passion

So, I finally saw The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre The Passion last night. It was…not what I expected. I mean, I know what ‘the passion’ is, but I was expecting something more in the ‘Life & Times of Jesus’ vein. Ah, in case you haven’t seen it and don’t want to hear any more, I’ll cut:

There were the intercut scenes of his past — which were a necessary (I wish I could think of a stronger word for ‘necessary’, because that’s what they were) relief — but they weren’t explained at all. I mean — Well. I’m not a Christian but I was raised Presbyterian, so I understood lots of the references. But I really wanted to come at the movie as if I didn’t know Christianity at all, and I found I really couldn’t. I guess I can’t really say whether that’s a limitation of the movie or of my imagination, but it seems that it would be rather confusing for someone who didn’t know the religion.

That’s mostly because there was no real plot, which brings me to my next point. Which is: there was no plot. My expectations coming in probably colored my perception of this as well, but I found myself glancing down at the timer on the dvd player, wondering how long the intro was going to last before the movie really started. While I was watching, it seemed to drag on and on and on interminably, but now that I think back it feels like a short movie because there’s not a lot to it plot-wise. They beat the crap out of a guy for two hours and then kill him. (Note: I know he’s not ‘a guy’ to a lot of people, and I don’t say that to be offensive. I’m just trying to communicate my experience of the movie.)

Maybe that’s my own religious views getting in the way. Because now that I think about it, I like lots of movies where there’s not a lot of action. Not much happens in ‘Lost in Translation’ — it’s more about the people and their relationships. But it didn’t feel like a short movie to me the way this does. Could have something to do with the abundant use of the slow-mo shots as well. Everything took five times longer to happen on screen than it would take in real life — which is valid, I suppose, as I’m sure someone going through it would experience it as taking much longer than it actually does. I think Jesus’ best scene was the opening, which really did pull me in. He was very human then as he doubted and wrestled within himself to accept what he knew was coming. And I was thinking the movie was going to really kick and show him as, well, human. But I really lost the thread of that as it progressed — I felt like I lost touch with him entirely as he became less a person and more a beaten body, and the movie became about everyone BUT him. Maybe Gibson was trying to make a point with that.

Mary stole the show, hands f’ing down. Mary’s what got me to watch the whole thing. I was ready to turn it off about a third of the way through because a) I can imagine a guy (holy or not) being brutally tortured for two and a half hours on my own and b) I don’t WANT to think about it for that long. But Mary was captivating. Which I suppose means if I were ever to become Christian again I’d have to be Catholic.

Cheesiest moment: At the end, where the devil (who was pretty cool up until this point) is kneeling in some weirdass place — I suppose it was meant to be hell — howling. It just…eh. I had trouble buying the setting, and — I don’t know. I just wasn’t sold on it.

Wow, I didn’t mean to ramble on like this. I suppose the movie’s nothing if not thought-provoking. Sorry to everyone who read this far, but I’m too lazy to go back and edit out even the worst of the rambling.

six comments:

  1. Katie said:

    What you said rang true for me, too. I went with Aviva, who is very Catholic. It was interesting, since she and I don’t share the same beliefs at all, to watch her react to the movie. Afterwards, she thoughtfully said, “I didn’t cry. Does that make me not a real believer? I hear everyone cries..” I don’t know. I didn’t cry. I know I heard other people in the theater doing so. Abe was interested in seeing it, but after I saw it I realized he wouldn’t get anything from it, since it’s almost necessary to know more than just the basics of the stories going in.

    But anyway. That devil howling thing? Way cheesy.

  2. rachel! said:

    I didn’t think I was going to cry, but the moment when Mary is in the alleyway, when she cannot go on, when she can’t stand to watch this happen to her son any longer, and then he falls and she remembers him as a little boy and she is running for him, she’s running to help her little boy back to his feet — that moment was absolutely wrenching for me. I think there were a few other times I was closer to crying — again, for Mary. But it was all the sorrow I feel seeing other people in emotional pain and nothing to do with faith or religion at all. That and probably hormones. ;)

  3. rachel! said:

    Also! Another thing that bugged me: No one threw up. I would think at least one of the people watching a man get flayed alive would’ve thrown up.

  4. rachel! said:

    Er… Sorry, Katie. Don’t read that previous comment!

  5. Bryce said:

    Jesus does not induce vomiting. Duh. Katie, don’t read this either. =)

  6. rachel! said:

    Another odd thing from the movie that I was thinking about yesterday: I wouldn’t've been surprised to get nightmares from it (which I didn’t, thank god). But they wouldn’t've been about the people doing the beating, or the devil, or anything like that. No, I would have had nightmares about Jesus. There’s something vaguely wrong with that. It doesn’t seem like a religious movie should give people nightmares about the god portrayed. Well, unless it’s one of those cool Eastern religions that has gods that’re meant to be really scary. Jesus isn’t, though. Jesus is like the fluffy bunny answer to Old Testament Wrathful-God.

Leave a comment:

You're not logged in.

You may Login or complete: